1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
|
/**
Copyright (c) Scott Gasch
Module Name:
see.c
Abstract:
Static exchange evaluator and support code. See also x86.asm.
Author:
Scott Gasch ([email protected]) 11 Jun 2004
Revision History:
$Id: see.c 348 2008-01-05 07:11:36Z scott $
**/
#include "chess.h"
#define ADD_ATTACKER(p, c, v) \
pList->data[pList->uCount].pPiece = (p); \
pList->data[pList->uCount].cLoc = (c); \
pList->data[pList->uCount].uVal = (v); \
pList->uCount++;
void CDECL
SlowGetAttacks(IN OUT SEE_LIST *pList,
IN POSITION *pos,
IN COOR cSquare,
IN ULONG uSide)
/*++
Routine description:
SlowGetAttacks is the C version of GetAttacks; it should be
identical to the GetAttacks code in x86.asm. The job of the
function is, given a position, square and side, to populate the
SEE_LIST with the locations and types of enemy pieces attacking
the square.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *pList : list to populate
POSITION *pos : the board
COOR cSquare : square in question
ULONG uSide : side we are looking for attacks from
Return value:
void
--*/
{
register ULONG x;
PIECE p;
COOR c;
int iIndex;
COOR cBlockIndex;
int iDelta;
static PIECE pPawn[2] = { BLACK_PAWN, WHITE_PAWN };
static int iSeeDelta[2] = { -17, +15 };
#ifdef DEBUG
ASSERT(IS_ON_BOARD(cSquare));
ASSERT(IS_VALID_COLOR(uSide));
VerifyPositionConsistency(pos, FALSE);
#endif
pList->uCount = 0;
//
// Check for pawns attacking cSquare
//
c = cSquare + (iSeeDelta[uSide]);
if (IS_ON_BOARD(c))
{
p = pos->rgSquare[c].pPiece;
if (p == pPawn[uSide])
{
//
// N.B. Don't use ADD_ATTACKER here because we know we're
// at element zero.
//
pList->data[0].pPiece = p;
pList->data[0].cLoc = c;
pList->data[0].uVal = VALUE_PAWN;
pList->uCount = 1;
}
}
c += 2;
if (IS_ON_BOARD(c))
{
p = pos->rgSquare[c].pPiece;
if (p == pPawn[uSide])
{
ADD_ATTACKER(p, c, VALUE_PAWN);
}
}
//
// Check for pieces attacking cSquare
//
for (x = pos->uNonPawnCount[uSide][0] - 1;
x != (ULONG)-1;
x--)
{
c = pos->cNonPawns[uSide][x];
ASSERT(IS_ON_BOARD(c));
p = pos->rgSquare[c].pPiece;
ASSERT(p && !IS_PAWN(p));
ASSERT(GET_COLOR(p) == uSide);
iIndex = (int)c - (int)cSquare;
if (0 == (CHECK_VECTOR_WITH_INDEX(iIndex, GET_COLOR(p)) &
(1 << PIECE_TYPE(p))))
{
continue;
}
if (IS_KNIGHT_OR_KING(p))
{
ASSERT(IS_KNIGHT(p) || IS_KING(p));
ADD_ATTACKER(p, c, PIECE_VALUE(p));
continue;
}
//
// Check to see if there is a piece in the path from cSquare
// to c that blocks the attack.
//
iDelta = NEG_DELTA_WITH_INDEX(iIndex);
ASSERT(iDelta == -1 * CHECK_DELTA_WITH_INDEX(iIndex));
ASSERT(iDelta != 0);
for (cBlockIndex = cSquare + iDelta;
cBlockIndex != c;
cBlockIndex += iDelta)
{
if (!IS_EMPTY(pos->rgSquare[cBlockIndex].pPiece))
{
goto done;
}
}
//
// Nothing in the way.
//
ADD_ATTACKER(p, c, PIECE_VALUE(p));
done:
;
}
}
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
//
// SEE_HEAPS works great in principle but makes MinLegalPiece
// inaccurate if the top of the heap is not a legal move (i.e. the
// piece is pinned etc...) When tested the result of this was minimal
// and the use of a heap instead of a sorted list sped up the SEE
// code.
//
#define PARENT(x) ((x - 1) / 2)
#define LEFT_CHILD(x) (((x) * 2) + 1)
#define RIGHT_CHILD(x) (((x) * 2) + 2)
#ifdef DEBUG
static FLAG
_IsValidHeap(IN SEE_LIST *p)
/**
Routine description:
Is the minheap in SEE_LIST p->data[] valid (i.e. does it satisfy
the minheap property?)
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *p : SEE_LIST to check
Return value:
static FLAG : TRUE if valid, FALSE otherwise
**/
{
ULONG u, l, r;
for (u = 0; u < p->uCount; u++)
{
l = LEFT_CHILD(u);
if ((l < p->uCount) && (p->data[l].uVal < p->data[u].uVal))
{
return(FALSE);
}
r = RIGHT_CHILD(u);
if ((r < p->uCount) && (p->data[r].uVal < p->data[u].uVal))
{
return(FALSE);
}
}
return(TRUE);
}
#endif // DEBUG
static void
_PushDown(IN OUT SEE_LIST *p,
IN ULONG u)
/**
Routine description:
Take heap node number u and compare its value with the value of
its children. Swap smallest value into position u and continue
the push-down process if warranted.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *p : SEE_LIST/minheap
ULONG u : node number in consideration
Return value:
static void
**/
{
ULONG l = LEFT_CHILD(u);
ULONG r;
ULONG uSmallest;
SEE_THREESOME temp;
//
// The heap is a complete tree -- if there's no left child of this
// node then there's no right child either. If this is a leaf node
// then our work is done.
//
ASSERT(p->uCount > 0);
if (l >= p->uCount)
{
return;
}
ASSERT(PARENT(l) == u);
//
// Otherwise, find the smallest of u, l and r.
//
r = l + 1;
ASSERT(r == RIGHT_CHILD(u));
ASSERT(PARENT(r) == u);
ASSERT((r != u) && (r != l) && (l != u));
uSmallest = u;
if (p->data[l].uVal < p->data[u].uVal)
{
uSmallest = l;
}
if ((r < p->uCount) && (p->data[r].uVal < p->data[uSmallest].uVal))
{
uSmallest = r;
}
//
// If it's anything other than u, swap them and continue to push.
//
if (uSmallest != u)
{
ASSERT((uSmallest == l) || (uSmallest == r));
temp = p->data[uSmallest];
p->data[uSmallest] = p->data[u];
p->data[u] = temp;
_PushDown(p, uSmallest);
}
}
static void
_BuildHeap(IN OUT SEE_LIST *p)
/**
Routine description:
Convert a random array into a minheap. Start at the first
internal node and push it down into place. Continue to work
backwards until we get to the root (index 0).
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *p : list to heapify
Return value:
static void
**/
{
int iStart = (p->uCount / 2) - 1;
int i;
ASSERT(iStart < (int)p->uCount);
for (i = iStart; i > -1; i--)
{
ASSERT(i >= 0);
_PushDown(p, (ULONG)i);
}
ASSERT(_IsValidHeap(p));
}
static void
_BubbleUp(IN OUT SEE_LIST *p, IN ULONG u)
/**
Routine description:
Take a node and bubble it up into place to re-create a minheap.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *p : heap
ULONG u : index of node to bubble up
Return value:
static void
**/
{
ULONG uParent;
SEE_THREESOME temp;
ASSERT(p->uCount > 0);
if (u == 0) return;
uParent = PARENT(u);
ASSERT((LEFT_CHILD(uParent) == u) ||
(RIGHT_CHILD(uParent) == u));
ASSERT(uParent < u);
if (p->data[uParent].uVal > p->data[u].uVal)
{
temp = p->data[uParent];
p->data[uParent] = p->data[u];
p->data[u] = temp;
_BubbleUp(p, uParent);
}
}
#else // !SEE_HEAPS
static void
_SortList(IN OUT SEE_LIST *pList)
/**
Routine description:
Sort the SEE list by piece value with a selection sort.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *pList
Return value:
static void
**/
{
ULONG x;
ULONG y;
register ULONG uMaxVal;
register ULONG uMaxLoc;
SEE_THREESOME sTemp;
for (x = 0;
x < pList->uCount;
x++)
{
//
// Assume index X is the largest value item in the list
//
uMaxVal = pList->data[x].uVal;
uMaxLoc = x;
//
// Look for others with a larger value
//
for (y = x + 1;
y < pList->uCount;
y++)
{
if (pList->data[y].uVal > uMaxVal)
{
uMaxVal = pList->data[y].uVal;
uMaxLoc = y;
}
}
sTemp = pList->data[uMaxLoc];
pList->data[uMaxLoc] = pList->data[x];
pList->data[x] = sTemp;
}
}
#endif
static void INLINE
_RemoveItem(IN OUT SEE_LIST *pList,
IN ULONG x)
/**
Routine description:
Delete item x from the list.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *pList,
ULONG x
Return value:
static void INLINE
**/
{
#ifndef SEE_HEAPS
ULONG y;
#endif
ASSERT(x < pList->uCount);
ASSERT(pList->uCount > 0);
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
//
// Swap item x with the last thing on the heap and then push the
// node back down.
//
if (x != (pList->uCount - 1))
{
pList->data[x] = pList->data[pList->uCount - 1];
pList->uCount--;
_PushDown(pList, 0);
}
else
{
pList->uCount--;
}
#else // !SEE_HEAPS
//
// If X is not the last thing in the list we will have to ripple
// shift to close the hole. This is rare.
//
for (y = x + 1;
y < pList->uCount;
y++)
{
pList->data[y - 1] = pList->data[y];
}
pList->uCount--;
#endif // SEE_HEAPS
}
static void
_ClearPieceByLocation(IN OUT SEE_LIST *pList,
IN COOR cLoc)
/**
Routine description:
Find a piece on the SEE list at COOR cLoc and delete it.
Parameters:
SEE_LIST *pList,
COOR cLoc
Return value:
static void
**/
{
ULONG x = 0;
while (x < pList->uCount)
{
if (pList->data[x].cLoc == cLoc)
{
_RemoveItem(pList, x);
return;
}
x++;
}
//
// This can happen if, for example, the SEE move was a passed pawn push
//
}
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
static PIECE
_MinLegalPiece(IN POSITION *pos,
IN ULONG uColor,
IN SEE_LIST *pList,
IN SEE_LIST *pOther,
IN COOR *pc,
IN COOR cIgnore)
/**
Routine description:
Return the piece from the SEE list with the lowest value that is
not pinned to its own king. Because we are storing the SEE_LISTS
as heaps, this is only an approximate value in the event that the
real min value piece is indeed pinned to its own king. I
considered sorting the list in this case but it seems like (in
tests) this inaccuracy really has little or no impact on the
search tree size. The speedup with heaps instead of sorted lists
seems worth the price.
Parameters:
POSITION *pos : the board
ULONG uColor : the color on move
SEE_LIST *pList : the list we're selecting from
SEE_LIST *pOther : the other side's list
COOR *pc,
COOR cIgnore
Return value:
static PIECE
**/
{
COOR cKing;
PIECE p;
register ULONG x;
COOR c;
//
// The list is a minheap with the min value piece at index 0.
//
for (x = 0;
x < pList->uCount;
x++)
{
p = pList->data[x].pPiece;
//
// If this piece is the king, then no need to see if the move
// exposes the king to check.. just play the move as long as
// it's legal (i.e. no defenders to the square)
//
if (IS_KING(p))
{
if (pOther->uCount == 0)
{
*pc = pList->data[0].cLoc;
//
// Note: if p is a king and we allow them to play it then
// by definition the other side has nothing to counter
// with... otherwise we'd be moving into check here. So
// even if we had other pieces that were pinned to the
// king, empty out the list because we're done in the next
// SEE loop.
//
pList->uCount = 0;
return(p);
}
}
else
{
//
// Otherwise... consider pins. If the least valuable
// defender of the square cannot move because doing so
// would exposes his king to check, skip it and try the
// next least valuable.
//
cKing = pos->cNonPawns[uColor][0];
c = ExposesCheck(pos, pList->data[x].cLoc, cKing);
//
// cIgnore is the coordinate of the last piece the other
// side "moved" in this capture sequence. This is a hack
// to ignore pins based on a piece that has already moved
// in the computation but is already on the board. This
// of course does not work for positions where the piece
// you expose check to was "moved" two turns ago but these
// are pretty rare.
//
if (!IS_ON_BOARD(c) || (c == cIgnore))
{
*pc = pList->data[x].cLoc;
_RemoveItem(pList, x);
return(p);
}
}
}
//
// There are no legal pieces to move to square
//
return(0);
}
#else // !SEE_HEAPS
static PIECE
_MinLegalPiece(IN POSITION *pos,
IN ULONG uColor,
IN SEE_LIST *pList,
IN SEE_LIST *pOther,
IN COOR *pc,
IN COOR cIgnore)
/**
Routine description:
Return the piece from the SEE list with the lowest value that is
not pinned to its own king.
Parameters:
POSITION *pos : the board
ULONG uColor : the color on move
SEE_LIST *pList : the list we're selecting from
SEE_LIST *pOther : the other side's list
COOR *pc,
COOR cIgnore
Return value:
static PIECE
**/
{
COOR cKing;
PIECE p;
register ULONG x;
COOR c;
//
// The list is sorted from most valuable (index 0) to least valuable
// (index N). Begin at the least valuable and work up.
//
for (x = pList->uCount - 1;
x != (ULONG)-1;
x--)
{
p = pList->data[x].pPiece;
//
// If this piece is the king, then no need to see if the move
// exposes the king to check.. just play the move as long as
// it's legal (i.e. no defenders to the square)
//
if ((IS_KING(p)) && (pOther->uCount == 0))
{
ASSERT(x == 0);
*pc = pList->data[0].cLoc;
pList->uCount = 0;
return(p);
}
else
{
//
// Otherwise... consider pins. If the least valuable
// defender of the square cannot move because doing so
// would exposes his king to check, skip it and try the
// next least valuable.
//
cKing = pos->cNonPawns[uColor][0];
c = ExposesCheck(pos, pList->data[x].cLoc, cKing);
//
// cIgnore is the coordinate of the last piece the other
// side "moved" in this capture sequence. This is a hack
// to ignore pins based on a piece that has already moved
// in the computation but is already on the board. This
// of course does not work for positions where the piece
// you expose check to was "moved" two turns ago but these
// are pretty rare.
//
if (!IS_ON_BOARD(c) || (c == cIgnore))
{
*pc = pList->data[x].cLoc;
_RemoveItem(pList, x);
return(p);
}
}
}
//
// There are no legal pieces to move to square
//
return(0);
}
#endif // SEE_HEAPS
static void _AddXRays(IN POSITION *pos,
IN INT iAttackerColor,
IN COOR cTarget,
IN COOR cObstacle,
IN OUT SEE_LIST *pAttacks,
IN OUT SEE_LIST *pDefends)
/**
Routine description:
We just "moved" a piece in the SEE sequence... add any xray
attacks that it exposed to the SEE list to be take part as the
sequence plays out.
Parameters:
POSITION *pos,
INT iAttackerColor,
COOR cTarget,
COOR cObstacle,
SEE_LIST *pAttacks,
SEE_LIST *pDefends
Return value:
static void
**/
{
int iDelta;
COOR cIndex;
PIECE xPiece;
int iIndex;
iIndex = (int)cTarget - (int)cObstacle;
//
// If there is no way for a queen sitting on the target square to
// reach the obsticle square then there is no discovered attack.
// (This could happen, for instance, if a knight captured. It
// can't uncover a new attack on the square where it took.
//
if (0 == (CHECK_VECTOR_WITH_INDEX(iIndex, BLACK) & (1 << QUEEN)))
{
return;
}
//
// The squares are on the same rank, file or diagonal. iDelta is
// the way to move from target towards obstacle.
//
iDelta = CHECK_DELTA_WITH_INDEX(iIndex);
//
// Search for a piece that moves the right way to attack the target
// square starting at the obstacle square + delta.
//
for (cIndex = cObstacle + iDelta;
IS_ON_BOARD(cIndex);
cIndex += iDelta)
{
xPiece = pos->rgSquare[cIndex].pPiece;
if (!IS_EMPTY(xPiece))
{
//
// Does it move the right way to hit cTarget? TODO: can this
// be optimized? Remember pawns though...
//
if (0 != (CHECK_VECTOR_WITH_INDEX((int)cIndex - (int)cTarget,
GET_COLOR(xPiece)) &
(1 << PIECE_TYPE(xPiece))))
{
//
// Add this attacker to the proper SEE_LIST
//
if (GET_COLOR(xPiece) == iAttackerColor)
{
pAttacks->data[pAttacks->uCount].pPiece = xPiece;
pAttacks->data[pAttacks->uCount].cLoc = cIndex;
pAttacks->data[pAttacks->uCount].uVal =
PIECE_VALUE(xPiece);
pAttacks->uCount++;
ASSERT(pAttacks->uCount > 0);
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
_BubbleUp(pAttacks, pAttacks->uCount - 1);
#else
_SortList(pAttacks);
#endif
}
else
{
pDefends->data[pDefends->uCount].pPiece = xPiece;
pDefends->data[pDefends->uCount].cLoc = cIndex;
pDefends->data[pDefends->uCount].uVal =
PIECE_VALUE(xPiece);
pDefends->uCount++;
ASSERT(pDefends->uCount > 0);
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
_BubbleUp(pDefends, pDefends->uCount - 1);
#else
_SortList(pDefends);
#endif
}
}
return;
}
}
}
SCORE
SEE(IN POSITION *pos,
IN MOVE mv)
/**
Routine description:
Given a board and a move on the board, estimate the value of the
move by considering the friend/enemy pieces that attack the move's
destination square.
Parameters:
POSITION *pos,
MOVE mv
Return value:
SCORE : the estimate of the move's score
**/
{
SEE_LIST rgPieces[2];
PIECE pPiece;
ULONG uInPeril;
SCORE rgiList[32];
ULONG uListIndex;
ULONG uWhoseTurn = GET_COLOR(mv.pMoved);
ULONG uOrig = uWhoseTurn;
int iSign = 1;
ULONG uPromValue;
ULONG uVal;
COOR cFrom = mv.cFrom;
static FLAG _Table[2][3] = {
// a<b a==b a>b
{ FALSE, FALSE, TRUE }, // uVal==0
{ TRUE, FALSE, FALSE }, // uVal==1
};
#ifdef DEBUG
ASSERT(mv.uMove != 0);
memset(rgiList, 0xFF, sizeof(rgiList));
memset(rgPieces, 0xFF, sizeof(rgPieces));
#endif
//
// Create a sorted list of pieces attacking and defending the
// square.
//
GetAttacks(&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]), pos, mv.cTo, uWhoseTurn);
GetAttacks(&(rgPieces[FLIP(uWhoseTurn)]), pos, mv.cTo, FLIP(uWhoseTurn));
#ifdef SEE_HEAPS
_BuildHeap(&(rgPieces[FLIP(uWhoseTurn)]));
_BuildHeap(&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]));
#else
_SortList(&(rgPieces[FLIP(uWhoseTurn)]));
_SortList(&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]));
#endif
//
// Play the first move -- TODO: the first move may be illegal...
// fix this?
//
rgiList[0] = (PIECE_VALUE(mv.pCaptured) +
PIECE_VALUE(mv.pPromoted));
uInPeril = (PIECE_VALUE(mv.pMoved) +
PIECE_VALUE(mv.pPromoted));
uListIndex = 1;
_ClearPieceByLocation(&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]), mv.cFrom);
_AddXRays(pos,
uWhoseTurn,
mv.cTo,
mv.cFrom,
&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]),
&(rgPieces[FLIP(uWhoseTurn)]));
//
// Play moves 2..n
//
do
{
//
// Other side's turn now...
//
uWhoseTurn = FLIP(uWhoseTurn);
iSign = -iSign;
pPiece = _MinLegalPiece(pos,
uWhoseTurn,
&(rgPieces[uWhoseTurn]),
&(rgPieces[FLIP(uWhoseTurn)]),
&cFrom,
cFrom);
if (0 == pPiece) break; // no legal piece
//
// If this is a pawn capturing and it ends on the queening
// rank, set uPromValue appropriately. Bitwise operators are
// correct here, done for speed and branch removal; this loop
// is pretty heavily used.
//
uPromValue = IS_PAWN(pPiece) & (RANK1(mv.cTo) | RANK8(mv.cTo));
uPromValue *= VALUE_QUEEN;
ASSERT((uPromValue == 0) || (uPromValue == VALUE_QUEEN));
ASSERT(uListIndex != 0);
rgiList[uListIndex] = rgiList[uListIndex - 1] +
iSign * (uInPeril + uPromValue);
uListIndex++;
ASSERT(uListIndex < ARRAY_LENGTH(rgiList));
uInPeril = PIECE_VALUE(pPiece) + uPromValue;
_AddXRays(pos,
GET_COLOR(mv.pMoved),
mv.cTo,
cFrom,
&(rgPieces[uOrig]), // These must be rgAttacks and
&(rgPieces[FLIP(uOrig)])); // rgDefends. Not based on tomove
}
while(1);
//
// The swaplist is now complete but we still must consider that either
// side has the option of not taking (not continuing the exchange).
//
ASSERT(uListIndex >= 1);
uListIndex--;
while (uListIndex > 0)
{
uVal = (uListIndex & 1);
iSign = ((rgiList[uListIndex] > rgiList[uListIndex - 1]) -
(rgiList[uListIndex] < rgiList[uListIndex - 1])) + 1;
ASSERT((iSign >= 0) && (iSign <= 2));
if (TRUE == _Table[uVal][iSign])
{
rgiList[uListIndex - 1] = rgiList[uListIndex];
}
uListIndex--;
}
#ifdef TEST_BROKEN
iSign = DebugSEE(pos, mv);
if ((rgiList[0] != iSign) &&
(iSign != INVALID_SCORE))
{
DumpPosition(pos);
DumpMove(mv.uMove);
Trace("Real SEE says: %d\n"
"Test SEE says: %d\n",
rgiList[0], iSign);
UtilPanic(TESTCASE_FAILURE,
NULL,
"See mismatch",
rgiList[0],
iSign,
__FILE__, __LINE__);
}
#endif
return(rgiList[0]);
}
|