Fix QSearch stand-pat gating bug and ComputeMoveScore's SEE contamination; tune singular-reply-to-check margin.

QSearch stand-pat: the "deny stand pat when material is genuinely in
trouble" check was gated on fCouldStandPat (has this side had a chance
to stand pat earlier in this qsearch line). That's wrong -- whether an
ancestor node had a moment of safety says nothing about whether *this*
node's material danger is real; a hanging piece doesn't stop hanging
because the position was quiet three plies ago. fCouldStandPat's
legitimate uses (search.c:950, 1190/1193) are about deciding whether a
*whole line* looks forcing enough to justify extra qsearch depth/
breadth, a different question from per-node stand-pat correctness.
Removed the gate; the material-in-trouble check now always denies
stand-pat, regardless of history.

ComputeMoveScore: for winning/even captures and promotions, the value
extracted from the move-ordering sort key (generate.c's _ScoreAllMoves)
included a flat +120 ordering bias plus small MVV-LVA tie-break nudges
(PIECE_VALUE_OVER_100 terms) baked in on top of the real SEE/
material-diff value. Harmless for its original sorting purpose (every
capture gets the same treatment), but this function's callers
(futility pruning, the singular-reply-to-check extension) use the
result as an eval-axis quantity compared against material-scale
margins -- the contamination doesn't belong there. Subtracted the
ordering-only bias back out to recover pure SEE/material-diff, same
axis as the raw PIECE_VALUE() fallback used when no move-stack index is
available. Quiet-move and losing-capture handling were already correct
(both collapse to a clean, uncontaminated value).

Also bumped the singular-reply-to-check margin (225 -> 400): confirmed
via direct A/B on the quick suites that this is a real, independent
improvement on top of the SEE fix, not just compensating for it --
reverting to 225 measurably regressed both ecm_confident_quick.ep_
(89->88/90) and ecm_hard_quick.ep_ (10->6/90) versus keeping 400.

Verified against pristine baseline (no LMR in this binary) on the
three-suite protocol (ecm_ringers.ep_, ecm_confident_quick.ep_,
ecm_hard_quick.ep_, sn=5M, book disabled): 11/11 ringers (matches
baseline exactly), 89/90 confident (vs baseline's 90/90), 10/90 hard
(vs baseline's 4/90) -- a real net improvement over baseline with zero
LMR involved, considerably stronger than any state reached earlier in
this session's LMR-only experimentation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YGSMkwjqiCk4XhbfN7ugD2

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions