|
EBF/beta-cutoff/counter-move stats, script.c FPE fix.
No LMR, no counter-move-driven move ordering (both explored separately,
kept out for now -- counter-move measured worse, ~655->647 solved on
ecm879 @ sn=4M with a leaner tree beforehand). Futility pruning restored.
Verified: 647/879 solved, EBF 4.609 @ sn=4M; 684/879 solved, EBF 3.995
@ 20s/move, 1cpu, 256m hash (typhoon_baseline.log).
The counter-move table is still written and its stats still tracked
(dynamic.c) for diagnostic purposes, but generate.c no longer reads it
for move ordering, so it has no effect on search behavior in this
commit.
lmr_testing/ holds the in-flight graded-LMR + counter-move code (not
applied here) with notes on what was already tried and measured, so a
future session can resume without re-deriving it.
|
|
uPositional was a per-thread EWMA of abs(material - true score) used to
size lazy-eval and futility margins. It was history-derived (reflecting
whatever recent, unrelated positions looked like) rather than derived
from the position actually being margined, and its update/consumption
was tangled with EVAL_HASH (now disabled).
Eval() now takes an optional SCORE *piPositional out-param and fills it
in on every return path: exact (abs(material-delta)) on a full eval,
or an estimate from a new EstimatePositionalScore() on a lazy exit.
EstimatePositionalScore()'s two terms (king-safety-defect-bucketed, and
a flat residual for mobility/passers/everything else) are calibrated
from ~1.6M measured full-eval samples (p90 of the actual swing), not
guessed -- an initial guessed version measurably regressed ECM solve
rate (630 vs a 650 baseline at sn=4M); the recalibrated version is back
at parity (649/879).
search.c's qsearch futility now reads the value Eval() just computed
instead of the stale/shared ctx field. Also removes QSearchInDangerNoStandPat
and SideCanStandPat, dead since the danger-hash check that fed them was
already commented out (e08387a) -- they depended on the same enprise/
trapped-piece data this conversation is about to move off of
g_PositionHash entirely.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
|
